RSLogix 5000 Paid Project $50

[jrflyer 0]

If anyone is interested in making a few extra dollars please let me know. 

I have a simple project that I will pay the first person to complete. 

I will close this thread once the first person completes,

It should only take 30 min and  I will Pay $50 via paypal. 

I will need you to email me the file once complete.   hauptc0943@yahoo.com

Below are the directions:

1) Please open up RSLogix 5000 and create a new v.17 program for a 1769-L35E processor named with your initials.

2) Add an Ethernet master and Ethernet I/O cards as per the prints.

3) Set up aliased tags for all I/O that is included in the prints.

4) Utilizing the aliased I/O tags, create logic for the following faults: a. Motor Disconnect Off b. Motor Overload Tripped c. Motor Failed To Start

5) Utilizing the aliased I/O tags, create some simple logic to start and stop Hot Water Pump #1 (911MTR). The motor should only start when there are no faults and the start pushbutton has been held for three seconds.

6) Integrate steps 4 and 5 into a single AOI for Hot Water Pump #2 (913MTR). 7) Create an UDT for a motor faceplate that includes variables for the following: voltage, FLA, Hz, RPM. Within this UDT, also include status variables for enabled, fwd, rev, and faulted, as well as control variables for start, stop, jog forward, and jog reverse.

8) In a separate routine, write logic using the UDT variables to turn on Hot Water Pump #1 when it is enabled and start or jog forward is pressed. If the motor gets above 3000 RPM, trigger a fault.

9) Within the routine for step 8, create a PID loop to control the tank temperature via the heat exchanger control valve. 10) Save your work and submit.

Schematics.pdf

Edited 6 Apr 2016 by jrflyer

[b_carlton 61]

You forgot to include the "prints" mentioned in the test directions.

$12 - that's it?

[TimWilborne 108]

If you'll try it yourself then you be making much more than $12 in 30 minutes when you get out.

[PLCMentor.com 60]

I had to login to see the replies to this one.  If you can do this all in 30 min I might hire you!  Be worth every penny of the $12 I would have to spend. 

[jrflyer 0]

I just updated the post, also added the prints. 

The first person to email me an accurate program will get $50 paypal. 

Please send program to hauptc0943@yahoo.com, 

The add will be removed once a program has been reviewed.

Thank you!

[TravisPedley 21]

Just a hunch, but i would bet you'd have a hard time determining if the program is accurate until your poor teacher looks at it.

 

[jrflyer 0]

You are probably correct. 

I can understand the logic and edit it, but am having trouble creating the program.

The teacher is going to go over it tomorrow, so i will have a better understanding of it.

But can someone please help me...

Thank you for your time. 

[TimWilborne 108]

There would have been a better chance at someone helping you if you had show what you had tried then asked for help instead of offering a $12...then $50 bribe, both of which are insulting to almost all of our time.

[kaiser_will 65]

You will probably achieve better results if you concentrated on your bottle-neck (i.e., having trouble creating the program) instead of offering a small amount of cash for an "accurate" program.

You could post what you have and go from there.

Most of us would probably bid 20 hours for this, at $150/hr.  It will be hard to find someone to do $3000 worth of work for $50.

[PLCMentor.com 60]

I just took a chance to look at the schematic.  Sad thing is it looks like you have a pretty good teacher that has taken the time to give you a real world situation with a drawing package that is realistic.  There are many students out there that are struggling with professors that have only read about PLCs and are taking tests on generic PLCs (which dont exist).  You might want to take a step back and struggle with this class and come out actually knowing how to program.  The struggle is the only way to learn how to do this stuff! 

 

[kaiser_will 65]

PLCMentor is spot on.  Most of us who studied at technical schools may have been given limited or no PLC programming experience.  What we know today is 99% on-the-job and acquired knowledge, such as consulting with the community on this forum.  Dang these fellas are smart.