Kontrol ACS

We also are working on a project where point I/O is being considered and moving forward could be the standard for many projects with this customer. Normally I am a jump on the new bus, normally as the driver, but with this I have few things that I believe should be considered. Point I/O , especially if you require OE4's or OB2P's be comes a bit of a mess as you have to provide empty slots with CTM/s on either side of the module or there will be temperature issues. There is a tech note on this. Point I/O is also less density per module, adding to the overall costs, etc. Missing as well is a great power distribution terminal system the 1794-TB3 offer, so you have to add terminals in your panel to accomplish this, more realestate...Finally the big kicker is that the wiring on the Point I/O TBs, is more suited for smaller gauge wore, which I'm ok with, as who needs AWG 14 to drive a 0.5 amp 24 VDC coil, however it does happen so to accommodate , one has to add another set of terminals. We tesed using larger wire and the tension, even relieved to the TB could cause the TB to loose connection to  the module, we found the TB actually flexed... Just some notes.. I'm voting with staying with Flex...