Furbs

MrPLC Member
  • Content count

    2
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

0 Neutral

About Furbs

  • Rank
    Hi, I am New!

Profile Information

  • Country United States
  1. New Scada - Wonderware or iFix

    Might be too late now, but I think people around my office would recommend iFix hands down. We use it for a lot of our systems. For me, I think Wonderware is great. It's easy and quick to develop. The hierarchy of derived templates is something that iFix is only just now catching on to. However, Wonderware has a number of quarks and since it is more user-friendly, that means it can be hard to debug. iFix is much more open in its format. I hear that once you get all the quarks worked on in Wonderware, its solid and requires little maintenance, but I haven't gotten to that stage yet. The transparency of iFix means it's easier to see what is happening and why. It uses VBA and pretty standard communication while Wonderware uses its only brand on network protocols. It sounds like you are looking for reliability above all else, so that's why I said iFix. Wonderware just had an overhaul of their system (~2010) so there might still be some bugs. Hope I helped.
  2. Hey guys, I have browsed this site a lot for answers but never had to post before. I know I'm posting Unity in the Modicon, but I figure many of you may also know Unity as well. I work in a lot of automation programming and perfect the Derived Function Blocks we use for a multitude of systems. For many different tasks we end up creating a block for a 3 pump system, then another for 5 pumps, and another for 7 pumps so that we don't waste too much memory. Is there a way to create a DFB that allows for extensible inputs? It would be great to just have one block that can be used for a variety of different sizes like the built-in ADD/MUL/OR/AND blocks already do. Does anyone know of any options to make blocks more scalable? Thanks!