How to find specific step no?

[Festerr 0]

Hi, guys!

GX Developer.

I've got such message. There is complex SFC project without plain numbering. So, i can't figure out how to find the step #200, that causes error.

Pls, help.

Edited 28 May by Festerr

[WattUp 36]

CTRL + G will bring up the jump to step box. 

[Festerr 0]

9 minutes ago, WattUp said:

CTRL + G will bring up the jump to step box. 

Thanks, but CTRL+G brings nothing.

[WattUp 36]

Remembering that I changed the default shortcut settings.. 
Go to the Find/Replace menu, Then the option is called JUMP, towards the bottom.  

[Festerr 0]

2 hours ago, WattUp said:

Remembering that I changed the default shortcut settings.. 
Go to the Find/Replace menu, Then the option is called JUMP, towards the bottom.  

Yes, there is "Find jump step" window, but it finds jumps, it says, there isn't such jump step exist.

The same result with "Find step no./block no."

[WattUp 36]

Oh i see. 

 

Maybe try searching for step 180 and going forward from there? 

Have you done an online verify? and looked for any issues in the results? 

 

[Festerr 0]

3 hours ago, WattUp said:

Maybe try searching for step 180 and going forward from there? 

Have you done an online verify? and looked for any issues in the results? 

 

1. The problem is that there are many blocks in the project, and the largest step no. in the block is 90. But now it shows error 6706 in step 266.

I gess, this is plain end-to-end numeration of steps. How to find that plain numeration number I can't figure out.

2. I've got that message by this way: "Diagnostics -> PLC diagnostics" (have a look at pic).

[Festerr 0]

So, I've found the bug in the project logically. But still it's interesting to see if it's possible to make such research a bit easier. 

[WattUp 36]

I do not have any programs with function blocks to test on, so maybe you can try this: 
When you do an online verify of the program, and open the code section does it still display as simple instruction based code? LD, OR, AND, OUT.. etc. 

 

[Festerr 0]

On 29.05.2024 at 7:51 PM, WattUp said:

does it still display as simple instruction based code?

Yes, it can do so. But the numeration begins at every block from zero. 

It's no go to find by step number at multi-block prog. But the bug I've found and understood it's nature.