Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
Jay Anthony

CQM1H and VB.net

11 posts in this topic

From PM this morning:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Amazing !! This guy typed the exact same PM to me

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
To my knowledge there are not yet any good commercial .Net libs for communicating with omron plcs. The ones i've tried are lacking. We're currently making one that will be able to handle CIO/HR/DM. It will support ethernet and serial communication. To answer your question about the serial communication in .net: SerialPort sp = new SerialPort("COM5", 9600, Parity.Even, 7, StopBits.Two); Also, Compolet is activeX based? ActiveX isn't the best in .NET just so you know.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I feel left out. I thought I was always copied on the mass PMs I must be loosing my touch

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Doesn't Omron's CX-Server Lite include a .Net communications control and example? Does anyone have this installed to check or has used this?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I've never used Compolet. I would see if they have a Host Link driver.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
http://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-us/library/s...serialport.aspx

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Compolet V2003 is compatible with .NET.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Using .net 2 with visual studio 2005 I found I needed to turn on 'RtsEnable' to establish any serial comms (this made sense but it took me a while to find the setting) - this was using the serialport component of .net 2.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
My point is that you should stay away from ActiveX components if possible if you're using .NET

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Hmm, well that may or may not be true. However, Compolet 2003 and FINS Gateway 2003 are specifically written for use with .NET as they are true .NET assemblies, and as such do not require any of the interoperability wrappers that legacy ActiveX controls do. Andy.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0