Greetings TWControls ...
regarding your kind comments ...
QUOTE
I think you did an excellent job at showing why your training is much more effective than other companies.
thank you, Tim ... that’s one of the major points that I wanted to get across ... undoubtedly the most common argument that I run up against when trying to market my classes is this:
“We’ve already sent our guys through several PLC training sessions – and they never get any better. Our people just can’t learn this stuff.”
the fact that the training that the employees have received just might be “wrong” has never even entered the boss’ mind – especially when the previous training company is as large as some of my friendly competitors ...
QUOTE
It is not that Ron knows some insider secret into how PLCs work. Even when he stumps you, after wards when you think about it you will say “I knew that”.
well, you’re right in saying that I don’t know any “insider secrets” – because MANY people do indeed know the stuff that I cover ... but, on the other hand, it seems that most people who TEACH the subject of PLCs do NOT seem to know these fundamental concepts ... I base that opinion on the fact that about 99% of the students who come to my classes have already been through “someone else’s” PLC training – and each Monday morning session invariably points out how seriously “flawed” their previous lessons have been ...
one specific case in point:
a few years ago one of our best customers sent about 40 students our way ... as always, we STRONGLY recommended that they start by sending their “Top Guns” first - and then work their way downward through the rest of the plant’s technicians ... one of the first students took me aside after the first day’s class and said something along these lines:
QUOTE
Ron, I’m actually the “go to guy” when things get really out of hand back at the plant. To tell you the truth, a lot of the time I never knew exactly what I was doing. First I’d cycle power off and on. Then I’d “force” here and there. Then I’d “toggle” here and there. Then I’d “hunt and peck” and try something else. Eventually I’d get the machinery to start running again. People thought I was a hero – but to be honest, most of the time I never knew exactly what step (if any) really “fixed” the system. Now after just this first day of the class, I know enough to go back and do something that I’ve been wanting to do for years – write up a set of “standard procedures” for all of our other technicians to follow for specific problems with the system. It’s not that I didn’t WANT to tell people what to do all along – it’s just that I didn’t know enough about interpreting what I saw on the screen to tell them WHAT to do. Now I finally know exactly HOW the PLC is working well enough to understand it myself – and to explain it to others.
Tim, I get comments like that in almost every class ... the point is that some technicians who SEEM to be competent don’t necessarily KNOW exactly what they’re doing ... that’s why every class is FULL of exercises just like the one in that first YouTube lesson ... how the students answer those questions reveals a lot about what’s right – and what’s wrong – with how they understand PLCs ...
QUOTE
Ron’s method introduces you to a whole new way of thinking that makes you follow it step by step just as a PLC does.
that, my friend, is PRECISELY the whole point of the project ... MANY people have asked me over the years: “But how can YOUR way of teaching PLCs be any different from how everybody does it?” ... well, there IS a BIG difference ... once I convince Mr. Customer of that fact, then I have ZERO trouble selling my classes ... my only problem with marketing so far has been gaining an audience with Mr. Customer in the first place ... I’m hoping (and praying) that YouTube Lesson #1 is going to end up on enough bosses’ computer screens to build my business to the next level ...
QUOTE
I admit, you got me on the seal in at the end of lesson 10.
that one gets a LOT of people – especially the skeptical ones who think that I’ve just “got another way of looking at PLCs” – and that their “old-school” ways work just fine ... as you said: “When you walk through it, the correct solution is very clear.” – but NOT if you try walking through it based on the traditional “switches and coils” and “green means true” methods that many people teach – and believe in ... when you try doing it that way, the incorrect explanation that results simply can NOT be made to agree with the reality on the Light Box ...
QUOTE
My solution is to scorn the use of duplicate OTEs ...
mine too ... I certainly don’t recommend them for programming purposes – but at the same time, I rely quite heavily on their use as “teaching tools” ... inserting these into the ladder logic is just one of many methods that allow me to take pinpoint control of the PLC’s program – and demonstrate exactly how the program works “under the hood” ... once the student fully understands these fundamental ideas, then those same concepts can be applied to MUCH, MUCH more than just troubleshooting “double coil” problems ...
finally (for now at least) I sincerely thank you for taking the time to post your comments here on the forum – where they can benefit as many people as possible ...
====================================================================
Greetings Mickey ...
QUOTE
One thing I would do is dump Archie – and use a sexy female voice.
well, to be honest, the voice doing the narration is actually MINE – not Archie’s ... going further, we actually had to postpone doing the audio for at least two or three weeks to let me get over a head cold – and a nagging cough ... (even so, you can hear my voice sort of crack in a few places) ...
anyway, I’ll keep your “female voice” suggestion in mind – as long as it doesn’t lead to too many people tuning in to the videos for the “wrong” reasons ...
QUOTE
I have not had a chance to view them all, but I echo TW’s comments.
thank you ... Archie and I were originally planning for just three or four lessons – and each one within the YouTube “ten minutes running time” limit ... once I got into developing the material, it became painfully obvious that anything less than the eleven lessons we ended up with just wouldn’t give enough detail ... so now we’re up to about 90 minutes of total running time – but at least I think we’ve put enough meat-and-potatoes into the stew to make it worthwhile - both for beginners - and for "beyond beginner" technicians ...
frankly, I’ve always hesitated to put this much of my personal “teaching material” out there in the public for free – but with retirement starting to creep up on me, I suppose that it’s time to lighten up a little bit ...
one thing that I’d really LIKE to happen is for more tech schools and colleges to take me up on my offer to “train the trainers” before I leave the trade ... hopefully these video lessons will show that my Boot Camp method is not only more accurate, it’s actually EASIER to teach - and to learn – than what’s being taught in most PLC classrooms today ...
again, I sincerely thank you for your comments ...
====================================================================
Greetings Russell ...
QUOTE
I have been following Ron and keeping up with his site for a couple years now. I linked to those vids as soon as I saw them available. Most of our content is done in house, but when we find good accurate info on youtube we definately include it. If Ron gets some business from it I'm all for it!
thank you for the kind compliments – and for the links ...
I’m still quite new to this YouTube business, so please forgive me for not answering your comment over on the “channel” yet ... to be honest, Archie was good enough to set all of that up for me, so I’m not exactly sure how to “log in” just yet – but I do appreciate your posting ...