[attachmentid=4920]Any one have time to inspect (pun) this with a critical eye.
How would the pros do it. Thank you for your time.

Giving it a quick look, I don't think this will work as you expect. But.....
I don't know you process.
Can you give a detailed description of the process.
Something along the lines of:
1. Box enters conveyor, when the case present PE is made, something happens.
2. If something else happens, then this happens.
etc....

Ken,
Sure, as an example, box is carried down a conveyor.
PE 1 sees box.
Magnetic "some type metal detecting prox" inspects for staples along centerline of box and counts until PE1 does not see box.
If counts is correct (determined by preset of C1) box is allowed to pass rejection blow off solenoid.
Cycle repeats with next box.

If count is not correct box is rejected by reject blow off.

If rejection does not pass through reject verification beam conveyor is stoped alarm sounds to alert operator to investigate problem/Jamb.

Thanks for looking,

That exactly what it appears to do. I was about to say that but you beat me to it.

All I see is a few rung comments that might need attention. Looks like you added/removed a rung and the comments followed.

I see what u mean. Take another look if you don't mind.

Try this

Thank you, I think the primary difference in the files are the way we lock in a good inspection i wasn't crazy about latches and your way guarantees a reevaluation everytime PE1 looses input. Is there a reason you have found this is better or is it simply an alternate method. I have not tried my method in the "Real World" I just think it should work. I greatly appreciate all scrutiny.