Forums.MrPLC.com: Multicast versus Unicast - Forums.MrPLC.com

Jump to content

This Month's Allen Bradley Forum is:

Sponsored by PDF Supply - PDF Supply sells New and Remanufactured GE Fanuc and Allen-Bradley PLC's
Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Multicast versus Unicast Rate Topic: -----

#1
User is offline   Fan Liu 

  • Sparky
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: MrPLC Member
  • Posts: 40
  • Joined: 28-July 10
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:China
  • Country:China
    China
From V18 Rockwell introduced unicast mode for Ethernet/IP communication. But unicast mode seems not effective compared to multicast transmission even with taffic contorl ability. For the same data produced by controller will send multiple times to each consumer due to the point to point transmission mode. Enable IGMP protocol within managed switch will effectively limit the multicast traffic on Ethernet/IP communication. So which is the best practice for Ethernet/IP, apply default multicast transmission with IGMP enabled managed swith for traffic control or just configure both producer & consumer to work on unicast mode?

This post has been edited by Fan Liu: 09 August 2012 - 08:41 AM

1

#2
User is offline   Ken Roach 

  • Propeller Head
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: MrPLC Member
  • Posts: 1,858
  • Joined: 31-January 02
You are correct; Multicast is more efficient for Listen-Only Inputs and for Produced/Consumed Messages with multiple Consumers.

Unicast connections were introduced for the sake of simplicity, because they do not require a correctly configured managed IP switching environment.

If your application requires the efficiency that Multicast gives you, install managed Ethernet switches with IGMP Snooping and Querying correctly enabled and configured.
1

Share this topic:


Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users