High-speed counter Interrupts ON CP1H

[tipex 0]

In an attempt to learn using interrupts I'm trying to use an interrupt for position a conventional induction motor connected to a linear axis. The motor is controlled by a V7 frequency converter with profibus connectivity. After reading som docs on the comparison table and making interrupt execution from the value of the High Speed Counter I tried to make a small program to test with. As far as I can understand I need to make an position table and load it with CTBL. The docs states this instruction is only avaliable with CPU21/22/23, but CX-programmer should give me a warning if this is not compatible with CP1H, just like it does if i set the PLC to CPU11? So, I've made my self a table using MOV that looks like this; D100 = #0001; D101 = #1000; D102 = #0000; D103 = #0010; Load the table with CTBL #0 #0 D100 and sets a value for the High Speed Counter input using INI #10 #2 D10 where D10 contains #1000/999/1001 after I change it. Then I have a program which is set as Task Type: Interrupt Task 10 and it sets an output. But when I simulate this the run count for the interrupt never increases and the output never changes(using differential monitor). Is it my approach that is plain wrong or is it not possible to simulate it like this? interrupt.zip

[tipex 0]

I'm most likely way of with the Counter. Tried som other experiments with just read//write/IO-simulation and it does not count or anything. Something smell like fubar.

[benbrad 0]

Does the high speed counter value change? If not Have you enabled the counter in the settings? Do you have the correct type of count for you input device (diff. phase, Up/down, etc)? Have the settings been sent to the PLC? Does the interrupt run when called manually using "TKON &8010"? Use "TKOF &8010" to stop it. I verify that interrupts are running by using "P_On" and "++(wordX)". WordX will increment each time the interrupt is cycled through.

[tipex 0]

After some testing I conclude with that I can't simulate the high-speed counter the way I attempted. Probably just have to wait until I get the physical PLC before I can check if my approach is correct :/ Edited 11 Sep 2007 by tipex