Search the Community

Showing results for tags 'subnet'.

  • Search By Tags

    Type tags separated by commas.
  • Search By Author

Found 5 results

  1. Following my post from yesterday and the fix proposed by @chelton, I went ahead and expanded the solution to multiple PLCs in the shop. Now I'm stumbling on another layer of difficulty : I have to RECV in a CP1L-E (10.1.14.214) from a NJ-301 (10.1.46.118). Both PLC's are physically connected to the same Ethernet Switch in the shop, but the IT guys decided to add a new subnet for PLCs and equipment some time ago. I read Michael Walsh's answer on this post but I couldn't figure out how to set things up properly with 2 subnets that are not consecutive. What do I need to setup in the CP1L-E to be able to RECV properly? There is certainly a routing table setup that I need to add but I cannot figure it out by myself. Here is the current setup : In the NJ, I have a UINT variable mapped At %W0, Network Publish set to "Output" The RECV command in the CP1L-E is as follows: C0 = 0001 (1 word) C1 = 0001 (Port 0, network 1) C2 = 7600 (node 118, unit address 0) C3 = 0203 (port 2, 3 retries) C4 = 0032 (5 sec timeout) The Built-in Ethernet parameters in the CP1L-E are attached Thanks !
  2. I currently have two NX1P2 PLCs communicating back and forth over ethernet IP. However, I am looking to expand this project across multiple PLCs and I need a way for one PLC to see all other PLCs that are connected to the LAN network via Ethernet IP. I can use the _EIP_EstbTargetSta[255] function which is a boolean value that returns true if there is an established connection  to a device where the last octet of the IP is specified in the array [255].  This function works well but my PLCs are configured with the subnet 255.255.0.0. And I need to see the connection status based on the third octet. Is there an existing function that I can use, or is there a way to view the full structured text for the _EIP_EstbTargetSta[255] function and modify it to suite my specific application? 
  3. Hello all, i'm looking at installing a completely new network for our PLC system, using a ring topology. at the same time i would like to incorporate the IP cameras and VOIP into the same network.  each system is on a different sub net, PLC = x.x.1.x, Cameras= x.x.2.x, VOIP= x.x.3.x estimated camera traffic will be 25 Mbps, PLC 10 Mbps, VOIP no more than 1 Mbps  switches would be capable of 100 Mbps  question: managed or un-managed switches? if it is possible to use un-managed without affecting operations then this would be a massive cost saving    please only comment if you have practical experience implementing this  many thanks Dan  
  4. Hello, At the plant I work at there are devices with IP addresses starting with 192.168.0, 192,168.1, and 193.168.2 The SLC in question is on 192.168.2 We would like to access it from our laptops which are on 192.168.0 The laptops have their subnet mask set to 255.255.252.0 and we are able to pull see other controllers on the 192.168.2 network. However, for some reason we can't with this one, not even when I'm plugged directly into the Ethernet port on the controller unless we change our IP address to one on 192.168.2 I believe the subnet mask on the controller isn't set right. Can anyone tell what I'm missing here? Here's an overview of the current settings: Laptop: 192.168.0.20, 255.255.252.0 Controller: 192.168.2.17, 255.255.252.0 Any help would be greatly appreciated. Ben