MrPLC Member
  • Content count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by dunc

  1. GOT 2000 scripting?

    has anyone used this and had much luck with it? i have been trying to do something relatively simple and am struggling. i simply want to add in a project script to log out a user after a set period of time. initially i tried it by trying to write to the data register in the PLC and this didnt work. I then tried managing it all within the GOT and it partially works, but if i fire the simulator up with the login level already there, it just wont work? below is the script i am using: //if login level above 0 or login above 0 and login time count at 0 if (([w:GD0] > 0) || (([w:GD0] > 0) && ([w:GD1] <= 0)))  { //set GOT seconds to login time count [w:GD1]=[w:GS7];} //while login level is above 0 while ([w:GD0] > 0) { //if 60 seconds elapsed if([w:GS7]-[w:GD1]>=60){ //set login level to 0 [w:GD0]=0;}}   i have tried lots of different iterations. i have tried using a 1 second sampling trigger point method as well as the method above with an ordinary trigger with no real joy. could it be me using the simulator causing the issue and i should get some proper hardware, or am i just being completely stupid? any guidance would be appreciated. thanks
  2. GOT 2000 scripting?

    i believe it is similar to C when i was looking through the manual. it gave an example of slightly changing it to run in a C compiler.  i think the issue i was experiencing was more to do with how the script is being run in the GOT rather than an issue with the script itself.
  3. GOT 2000 scripting?

    brilliant, that explains it then. i guess when you use a 60 second sampling time, it is running the script once every minute so it doesn't time out. that does restrict its use somewhat, but at least i now know the limitations.   thanks
  4. GOT 2000 scripting?

    looks like the while loops time out after a time. if you have 10 seconds before you break out of the while loop, its fine. when i increased it to a minute, that gives up and appears to do nothing.   this rings true with my other more basic bit of code i tried.
  5. GOT 2000 scripting?

    previously i have just controlled it from the PLC, but after moving over from the E-series terminals to the GOT, i thought it would be nice to keep the same logout control done from the HMI itself to keep things neat. i have got something that works, but whilst getting that to work, found that the 'while' statements are not really working as expected.
  6. GOT 2000 scripting?

    tried this basic script and it works, but only for a short period of time, then it stops working? while ([b:GB200] == 1) { [s16:GD200] = 10; }   this is very odd?
  7. GOT 2000 scripting?

    the GOT turned up about an hour ago (i was using a GT23), so gave it a try myself and got the same result. like you say, it appears the 'while' loop is not working at all. 'if' statements are fine for alot of situations, but the 'while' statements should still work!? perhaps 'while' statements do not work in project scripts for some reason?
  8. GOT 2000 scripting?

    i have only been using the simulator, so suspect that could be a potential issue. i have ordered the screen for the project, but it hasn't arrived yet. if you have the chance to test it, that would be appreciated.
  9. GOT 2000 scripting?

    there are object scripts, screen scripts and project scripts. i used this script as a project script so should run constantly. the second script i posted functions perfectly fine, i just cant see why i couldnt get it to work using "while" statements? on this occasion i got round it, but i may have an application where i cant just use "if" statements to achieve what i want!   hopefully someone will come along who has played around with them a bit more
  10. GOT 2000 scripting?

    managed to get it to work. i cant get my head around how the WHILE statements work. if i use IF statements only it works fine!? am i being dumb? anyway, this worked: if ([w:GD0] == 0) { [w:TMP0] = 5;} if ([w:GD0] > 0) { [w:TMP0] = [w:TMP0] - 1; if ([w:TMP0] <= 0) { [w:GD0] = 0; } }
  11. we don't tend to use SD cards, but that is a good one to remember for the future.
  12. in GX works; is there any way around reading a structured project from a Q series CPU if the symbolic data (which takes up loads of room) isn't downloaded to the CPU initially? with a simple project you can simply read the program straight to a new project and then work with it. this doesn't appear to be possible with a structured project? siemens and allen bradley can manage this without having a huge CPU for a relatively small program, why cant mitsubishi?
  13. adding signal???

    this should be simple and i have done it before with no issues. i simply want to add a button on screen to turn a bit on in the PLC. i added the signal in the point editor and all the settings are the same as a button i have added before. i have added the button on the mimic, done a bit of script to control it as before. i have recompiled the runtime. if i try and use the button, the signal does not change in the PLC. if i force the signal in the PLC, the colour of the button will not change either. everything else works perfectly fine including the button i added in a month or so ago. any ideas what i have missed? im sure its something stupid!   many thanks Duncan    
  14. i wish to segment my ip address areas out to free up more available IP addresses and to give some area definition based on the numbers used. i want to keep things simple without messing with dhcp or managed switches as we have limited management resource and a mixture of old and new equipment, some of which wont support dhcp anyway.   i have a network setup via 3 q03ude cpus. i have had no issues so far until i come to the 3 PLCs communicating over a tcp/ip connection via an open port connection on the master plc. 2 of the plcs have the ip address 192.168.3.x but one has the ip address of 192.168.11.x   they will communicate fine if on the same network with the last set of ip address numbers being the unique identifier, just not if i use the last 2 sets of numbers as the unique identifiers, even with a blank subnet mask in the PLC ethernet setting tab (no subnet masking?) with a subnet mask of my pc will pickup all the devices on the various ip address ranges as long as the first 2 numbers are 19.168.x.x which is as expected.   how do i go about getting the tcp/ip comms to work as i want to? the only settings i can adjust on the function block are the ip address itself (in hex) and the port numbers. this is only at the master PLC end. only port numbers can be changed at the slave PLCs. any assistance would be appreciated. i have limited networking knowledge. thanks  
  15. adding signal???

    really odd one. day 3 of trying this and i had another look about. found a utility on the taskbar which allowed you to monitor and change point values. did this with the signal that i was having trouble with and this managed to change the signal. the SCADA button now works as it should? did i miss something when adding the button and me using that utility forced it to work?
  16. i wish, i am in a maintenance department. we barely have enough to keep things going, let alone spares to set up a test rig.  everything i do has to be on the live system!!! i have no station number issues when i put them all on the same network, so wouldnt have thought it would be that? did get a chance to get on it last friday as had issues with something else :(   will try again this friday!
  17. yes, everything is 192.168.x.x based. i am not using the gp.read instruction. the system is setup using a function block downloaded from mitsubishi that sets the ip address and the port information only. i am hoping it is something i need to fill in on the network parameter pages, just struggling due to my limited knowledge. having done some extra reading i have a few extra things i can try, only problem is i only get the plant on a friday evening as it is running the rest of the time. will report back on how i get on  
  18. Conveyor belt help (Ladder diagram)

    if it is not a "real life" project you can physically see, then i find it easier to visualize if i draw it out. so draw your tank and conveyor, a temperature sensor etc. once you have drawn it, you can label the inputs/outputs and then work your way from there to achieve the outcome.   as others have said, we are more than welcome to help if you have a go first
  19. TIA PORTAL connect with Mitsubishi FX3U

    probably better off posting that one in the Siemens specific forum section.   if you search google, there are some youtube videos that may be of help.
  20. First time with QS PLC, Starts up in stop

    we had a similar issue with an omron safety plc. when installed they had an issue with a safety input so it would always power up with a fault and not allow the outputs to run the system until reset.. once the safety fault was corrected, it was ok. it could be that something is starting up in a fault condition when you put the power on which is putting the safety plc into stop?  it is hard to suggest a suitable way around this without knowing a bit more about the system. unfortunately, i havnt done much with safety PLCs myself either.
  21. GT Simulator

    what options do you have if you click the drop down menu under option-> connection?
  22. GT Simulator

    on the drop down list where you select GX simulator 2, there should be some other options. i generally just try those and one tends to work.   its probably due to how you install the software or something!?
  23. GT Simulator

    i have had issues with the simulators. they seem to pick and chose what works and what doesnt on each install. have you tried selecting any of the other simulators?
  24. GSM Module using with Mitsubishi Q PLC

    the attached may help. this was using a QJ71C24-R2 module. i am not 100% sure of the radio modem type.   text message.zip
  25. subnetting question?

    I Havnt managed to get back onto it to be honest. thanks for the suggestion. i wanted to keep things simple as IT are not interested in helping (plus they work 9-5 and that is it). i am also the only person on site other than IT that has any networking knowledge. we dont have the resource to manage anything too complicated. like you said, adding extra items onto the network isnt always a simple case of setting the IP address and plugging it in using your above suggestion. if in the middle of the night we had a network issue, i would like everything to be physical unmanaged switches so a like for like replacement is easier for an engineer. in simple terms, if the lights arent working, they can get a new switch out of the stores, plug it in and it works.   i do plan to give it a go at some point, just need to free up some time to allow me to sit down and try it in theory and then in practice without disrupting production. i will let you know how i get on.